Why Religion is Bad...

Why is it, that if you believe in "God" then your opinions and views are much more important than those who do not believe?

Why is it that you have to believe in "God" in order to have morality? The definition of morality is this: Morality means a code of conduct held to be authoritative in matters of right and wrong. Morals are created by and define society, philosophy, religion, or individual conscience. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality) Notice in the definition that it does not hold morality as being strictly based in religious beliefs. I do not believe in the existence of "God", however I do have a strong sense of morality and ethics. I base my morals in common sense. To me it is obvious that murder is wrong, I don't have to base my conclusion on a "higher power". I have the consciousness and common sense to come to that conclusion myself. I wasn't raised with religion either, so you can't deduce that the morality I have now comes from a religious base from childhood. Most of my morality and education comes from being given taught common sense.

I credit a lot of my common sense as coming from my mom, Oprah, the TV show Growing Pains and watching other people make mistakes. I have the ability to watch other people make mistakes and know that I don't want to have the same outcome. I have never had that glossy, fair tale in my mind of maybe it will be different if I do it. That is not to say that I never try anything on my own, because I do, I just watch for mistakes that could happen in the future, I pay attention to the red flags in my mind, my heart. I don't go against the internal voice I have telling me not to do something. And no that voice is not "God", that voice is my own saying, you know what I have seen this situation before, or I see what is on the horizon and then I take responsibility for that and move in a different direction. No religion needed whatsoever!

So now I ask again, Why is it, that if you believe in "God" then your opinions and views are much more important than those who do not believe? Why are politicians forced to conform to the religious ideals that are set forth by the Evangelical Christians. Is it not a better thing in this country to not have a leader who is beholden to one group or another? Don't people get all bent out of shape when there are lobbyists in Washington DC trying to get their message heard by politicians? Don't those lobbyists represent a group of people who want their voice heard, whether it is a large company or a fringe group? What makes a lobbyist any different from the Evangelical Christian groups?

I have a real issue with the meeting of the candidates tonight. They are attending a 2 hour forum at a church in California in order to discuss religion and values. Can a person NOT have values without religion? Are the problems we have in the world today based on a religious belief? No. They are all encompassing problems that are spread over those with religion and those with no religion.

Stop trying to force your opinions, values and self announced moral authority on those of us who don't share your opinions, values and self announced moral authority. I for one am doing gloriously without your nonsense.